Michael Connell, Ph.D.
Principal Research Scientist
Michael Connell is an expert in Persian-Gulf security-related issues, the armed forces of Iran, U.S.-GCC security cooperation, and adversary cyber policy and strategy. He has served as CNA's Field Analyst to Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT).
Prior to joining CNA, Connell was an intelligence officer in the U.S. Army.
Connell has a Ph.D. in History and Middle Eastern Studies from Harvard University and a B.A. in Near East Studies from Brandeis University. He speaks Persian and French.
RECENT NEWSSeptember 18, 2019
According to the CNA report, Russia's Approach to Cyber Warfare, "They [Russian military theorists] conceptualize cyber operations within the broader framework of information warfare, a holistic concept that includes computer network operations, electronic warfare, psychological operations, and information operations."
CyberScoop: "Sen. Warner Says Hacking, Disinformation Are the Future of War, and Urges the U.S. to Keep Up"August 29, 2019
Michael Connell says, "I think it's going to embarrass the Iranian space agency. On the other hand though, getting a satellite into space ... takes time."
Associated Press: "Satellite Photos Show Burning Iran Space Center Launch Pad"
Michael Connell says, "I would certainly expect them [Iran] to conduct attacks on low-hanging fruit economic targets, and also government targets as well."
Christian Science Monitor: "US-Iran Clash Enters Cyber Realm and Tests a Trump Strategy"June 24, 2019
Michael Connell says, "There is a great potential for miscalculation on both sides – that is the real danger."
The Christian Science Monitor: "US-Iran Standoff: Mutual Provocations, and Moves to De-Escalate"June 18, 2019
Michael Connell says, "The biggest threat is the mine threat. Not the limpet mines, but distributing mines in the water."
The Christian Science Monitor: "Can the US Protect the Persian Gulf If Iran Wants to Target Tankers?"April 24, 2019
Michael Connell says that it is unlikely Iran will close the Strait of Hormuz because, "To do so would give the United States, its coalition allies, and its Gulf partners a casus belli and lead to war, which would undoubtedly end badly for Iran, although everyone involved would suffer consequences."
BBC: "Iran Oil Waivers: Is It About to Become More Expensive to Fill My Car?"
Adversary Analytics Program