News Release

April 6, 2016

For Immediate Release
Contact: David Vordick, VP & CIO
vordickd@cna.org, (703) 824-2015

CNA Releases 2016 Retirement Choice Report and Updated Calculator

Arlington, VA — Today CNA released an updated version of its web-based calculator that allows military servicemembers to determine which Department of Defense retirement plan will best serve their needs—a decision that could cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars in retirement benefits.

Military personnel who entered service after July 31, 1986, who are eligible and intend to serve for 20 years, must choose between two retirement plans at their 15th year of service: High-3 plan, which bases retirement pay on the highest average basic pay for three years of their careers; and the REDUX plan, which provides a $30,000 upfront career status bonus with smaller retirement checks over time.

The calculator, developed by CNA as part of its annual Retirement Choice study, allows future retirees to determine how much they would earn under the two competing retirement plans and decide which one is right for them. 

To use the calculator, servicemembers type in the year they entered military service, the number of years they will have served when they retire, their tax rate, their paygrade at retirement, and their anticipated life expectancy. The calculator then generates the cumulative retirement pay with High 3 and the cumulative retirement pay with REDUX.

As reported in the conclusion of CNA’s latest retirement study report, Retirement Choice 2016:

We find that, for almost all servicemembers, the REDUX retirement plan plus a $30,000 bonus paid at the 15th year of service is a bad choice that significantly reduces their retirement income. The higher the grade, the lower the years of service at retirement, and the longer the servicemember lives, the greater the reduction. Moreover, as each year passes, the difference between REDUX and High-3 retirement income increases.

"The REDUX bonus effectively amounts to an early, partial cash-out of a servicemember's retirement plan, which translates into less future retirement income," said Anita Hattiangadi, research team leader for CNA’s Resource Analysis Division’s Marine Corps Manpower Team and one of  the report’s authors. "The bonus may seem appealing but it’s important to understand the cost of that short-term gain in terms of lost long-term benefits."

CNA’s Resource Analysis Division also focuses on such issues as infrastructure and readiness, cost and acquisition, workforce training and education, and energy and the environment.

CNA is a nonprofit research and analysis organization dedicated to developing actionable solutions to complex problems of national importance. With nearly 700 scientists, analysts and professional staff, CNA takes a real-world approach to gathering data. Its one-of-a-kind field program places analysts on carriers and military bases, in squad rooms and classrooms, and working side-by-side with a wide array of government decision-makers around the world. In addition to defense-related matters for the U.S. Department of the Navy, CNA’s research portfolio includes criminal justice, homeland security, energy security, water resources, enterprise systems and data analysis, and education.

Note to writers and editors: CNA is not an acronym and is correctly referenced as "CNA, a research organization in Arlington, VA."


Contact

Fiona Gettinger
Communications Specialist
703.824.2388
gettingerf@cna.org

communications@cna.org
3003 Washington Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22201