Research for Schools and Colleges

Syndicate content
March 1, 1998
This paper summarizes FY 97 efforts to increase the recruitment of community college graduates, specifically targeting the recruitment of graduates with allied health care specialties. It compares the efforts and results for the last two years and offers recommendations for FY 98. Despite many new efforts initiated in FY 97 aimed at the community college market, only 17 more recruits had Associate degrees in FY 97 than in FY 96. Since the shift from recruiting from high school to the community college market is a major change, it will take some time to make significant progress. It appears more resources are needed for the general recruiting effort and possibly a further increase is necessary to expand community college recruiting.
Read More | Download Report
March 1, 1998
This paper describes two federal programs that could facilitate the Navy's efforts to recruit pretrained people as well as benefit general recruiting efforts from community colleges: the School-to-Work Opportunities Act and the Tech Prep Act. It offers recommendations on how to apply these programs specifically to the Navy, in terms of the types of targeted fields of study and activities for active participation that are vital components of these federal programs. It also recommends forming partnerships to create tailor-made courses of study around training curricula that have significant civilian overlap, which could save significant training costs and enhance Navy's recruiting efforts at community colleges.
Read More | Download Report
March 1, 1998
This study looks at the potential of outsourcing courses for active duty sailors to community colleges using their facilities and significant parts of their curricula. This project investigated the potential for outsourcing three courses, focusing the analysis on two community colleges and two other types of training institutions. The analysis addressed if it is possible or even necessary, to move Navy training equipment to a community college site and how transferable the subject matter is. The analysis also examines the cost-effectiveness of outsourcing the training. The analysis shows that community colleges have distinct advantages that enable them to provide training that is similar to the Navy but at a lower cost. The findings indicate significant overlap with current community college curricula and that the colleges were willing and eager to modify current programs to accommodate the Navy's training requirements.
Read More | Download Report
January 1, 1998
As the Navy has downsized its forces, funding for a variety of activities has dropped. The Navy's flagship schools, The United States Naval Academy, The Naval War College, The Naval Postgraduate School, and for purposes of this study, The Armed Forces Staff College, have not been immune to these reductions. In response, N81 asked CNA to take a bottom-up look at each the Navy's flagship schools. The main goals of the assessment were, first to evaluate the current quality of condition of the schools, and second, to help determine the level of funding needed over the Future Year Defense Plan (FYDP) to maintain Navy schools as 'top-tier' institutions. The study summarizes the findings and recommendations regarding funding and opportunities for efficiency improvements. One important finding focuses on the effectiveness of the current structure of the graduate education system. Although the flagship schools offer excellent graduate and professional military education, the Navy does not use its graduates in a manner consistent with these programs of study.
Read More | Download Report
October 1, 1997
In the fall of 1995, CNA began working with personnel in the Bureau of Medicine (BuMed), Bureau of Personnel (BuPers), and Navy Recruiting Command (CNRC) on an experiment to conduct active Navy recruiting on community college campuses. This research memorandum summarizes the first 11 months of this initiative.
Read More | Download Report
March 1, 1991
This paper examines the curriculum of the Naval War College, focusing on adapting the current three-course program to provide a more appropriate education for the officers looking to meet the nation's needs through the tumultuous decade ahead.
Read More | Download Report
January 1, 1989
This research memorandum examines the extent and nature of attrition from initial skill (A-school) training in selected samples of technical and non-technical ratings. The influence of recruit-quality characteristics on both academic and nonacademic attrition rates is discussed. In addition, the analysis examines how attrition varies by type of A-school training and how it has changed over time.
Read More | Download Report
September 1, 1988
Navy A-school training provides the basic skills necessary for new recruits to become qualified in their ratings. Not all students successfully complete the A-school pipeline they start. This research memorandum examines the reasons for attrition and provides some preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of reclassifying those students.
Read More | Download Report
June 1, 1987
This research memorandum assesses the impact of changes in endstrength, force mix, technology, and other factors on specialized skill training load. It focuses on C-school training because that area has experienced the most growth. This work relates training to the number and types of personnel in the inventory and to manpower requirements.
Read More | Download Report
February 1, 1987
A joint specialist is an Officer who has attended a joint professional military education school such as the Armed Forces Staff College followed by a joint-duty assignment. This research memorandum describes the Joint Specialist Community Model designed to provide Navy policymakers and planners with information for managing joint billets and the joint specialist community in ranks O-4 through O-6. The model uses variables such as the average billet length and promotion rates to determine both the size of the joint specialist community and the number of O-6s able to meet the joint service requirement for promotion to ranks O-7 and above (i.e., flag). The model has been installed on a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet to facilitate its use in studying policy options.
Read More | Download Report