Research for Proficiency

Syndicate content
March 1, 2010

Under the accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, states are required to assess students in reading and math and to identify them as below proficient or as proficient or advanced (both considered passing). Because schools are held accountable only for ensuring that students test proficient or better, there have been concerns that a focus on increasing the percentage of students testing proficient might unintentionally lead to fewer students testing at the advanced level. This report finds that schools in Kentucky and Virginia with the greatest increases in the percentage testing proficient or better also have the greatest increases in the percentage testing advanced. Prepared by Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Appalachia, administered by CNA Education.

Read More | Download Report
October 1, 2000
The purpose of this research memorandum is to attempt to correlate existing individual exercise training data that reflect warfighting proficiency to training effort expended. Our tasking was to use existing fleet data sources. Previous CNA studies have concentrated proficiency to training resources, but this effort required unique and extensive data collection and did not always reflect existing data sources. Our goal was to identify a similar connection based on existing fleet data sources. We analyzed unit training for three types of platforms for three mission areas: multi-crew support aircraft (P-3Cs) and their anti-submarine warfare (ASW) mission; surface combatants and their naval surface fire support (NSFS) mission; and tactical aircraft (F/A-18s) and their strike warfare (STW) mission.
Read More | Download Report
January 1, 1994
The Navy trains pilots to fly a variety of aircraft. At present, all student pilots attend primary training in the fixed-wing T-34 training aircraft and are then assigned to specialized advanced training 'pipelines.' In this paper, we document the Navy's use of observed flight performance in primary to assign student pilots for advanced training. We examine the ability of the Navy to predict student pilot performance before primary begins and early in primary. First, we predict primary flight performance before flight training begins, using the data employed to screen candidates into flight training. Next, we predict primary performance using flight stage grades earned early in primary. We address two major policy issues: (1) how would pipeline selection be affected if the Navy had two separate primaries, one for helicopter training and another for fixed-wing training? and (2) how would pipeline selection be affected if helicopter pilots were selected early in primary training?
Read More | Download Report
September 1, 1990
This paper addresses issues related to the use of alternative and surrogate tests of the skills associated with rifle firing.
Read More | Download Report
January 1, 1985
This report describes a proposed system that could be used by senior management personnel to monitor the performance of Naval Air Rework Facilities (NARF's). Quantitative indicators are introduced for gauging performance in eight key subject areas: quantity, quality, timeliness, backlog, cost, productivity, efficiency, and overhead. These indicators are displayed for each major product line by means of control charts that depict historical performance, performance goals, and lower limits of acceptable performance. Actual performance data for the second quarter of FY 1984 are used to illustrate the proposed system.
Read More | Download Report
December 1, 1978
The efficiency and fairness of procedures used to select enlisted men for the Navy and for schools, jobs, and advancement are examined. The literature on selection-testing, training, and performance evaluation is reviewed. Ways of increasing personal performance and opportunity are suggested.
Read More | Download Report