Research for Logistics Requirements

Syndicate content
May 1, 1993
The Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 1992 directed the Secretary of the Navy to study 'the costs of improving the Port of Haifa, Israel, and facilities in the immediate vicinity, to accommodate the full complement of services required for the maintenance, repair, and associated tasks needed to support a carrier battle group.' The Secretary of the Navy tasked the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) to conduct the study. He asked that we address rotationally deployed naval forces to the U.S. Sixth Fleet. This study did not address homeporting in Haifa. We assumed that the Navy would continue to maintain its self-sufficiency. The results of the study as a whole are being published in three parts plus a summary. The parts are harbor services, ship maintenance, and logistics support. This paper summarizes the research on maintenance. CNA was supported in its maintenance research by the NAVSEA Shipbuilding Support Office in Philadelphia, and much of the material in this paper was drawn from their report. See also 27 930089.10 - 27 930092.10.
Read More | Download Report
May 1, 1993
The Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 1992 directed the Secretary of the Navy to study 'the costs of improving the Port of Haifa, Israel, and facilities in the immediate vicinity, to accommodate the full complement of services required for the maintenance, repair and associated tasks needed to support a carrier battle group.' The Secretary of the Navy tasked the Center for Naval Analyses to conduct the study. He asked that we address the needs of rotationally deployed naval forces in the U.S. Sixth Fleet. We did not address homeporting in Haifa. We assumed that the Navy would continue to maintain self-sufficiency of its deployed forces. Providing support to visiting ships can be thought of in two dimensions: (1) the level of services each ship will demand; and (2) the number of ships that will simultaneously make such demands. Even more complicating is the fact that different types of ships request different levels and types of service. To cover the range of needs the port of Haifa may encounter in the future, we examined different levels of demand and support. Our analysis examines requirements generated by five notional task groups, comprising various numbers and types of ships. For each task group, we also analyze different degrees of support and provide assessments of the marginal benefits of a range of investment levels. This paper presents our research on logistics issues relevant to ship visits to Haifa and support of fleet operations in the general vicinity of Israel. We also address the flow
Read More | Download Report
May 1, 1993
The Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 1992 directed the Secretary of the Navy to study 'the costs of improving the Port of Haifa, Israel, and facilities in the immediate vicinity, to accommodate the full complement of services required for the maintenance, repair, and associated tasks needed to support a carrier battle group.' The Secretary of the Navy asked the Center for Naval Analyses to conduct the study. He asked that we address the needs of rotationally deployed naval forces in the U.S. Sixth Fleet. We did not address homeporting in Haifa. We assumed that the Navy would continue to maintain self-sufficiency of its deployed forces. The study addresses: (1) the needs of the Sixth Fleet, including carrier battle groups when they operate or visit ports in the eastern Mediterranean; (2) Haifa's capabilities to meet the Fleet's support demands; and (3) upgrades to services that would improve overall support to the Fleet. This report summarizes our findings and conclusions. We provide the data and analysis that support these conclusions in three separate documents, each corresponding to a different category of support -- harbor services, ship maintenance, and logistics support. See also 27 930090.10 - 27 930092.10.
Read More | Download Report
May 1, 1993
The Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 1992 directed the Secretary of the Navy to study 'the costs of improving the Port of Haifa, Israel, and facilities in the immediate vicinity, to accommodate the full complement of services required for the maintenance, repairs, and associated tasks needed to support a carrier battle group.' The Secretary of the Navy tasked the Center for Naval Analyses to conduct the study. He asked that we address rotationally deployed naval forces to the U.S. Sixth Fleet. We did not address homeporting in Haifa. We assumed that the Navy would continue to maintain its self-sufficiency of deployed forces. We have published the results of our study in separate documents -- one each on harbor services, ship maintenance, and logistics support, plus a summary report. This research memorandum addresses the harbor services portion of the support provided to ships visiting Haifa. Our work was supported by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Division. See also 27 930089.10 - 27 930092.10.
Read More | Download Report
October 1, 1991
This volume of the Desert Storm Reconstruction Report describes the logistics support provided to naval forces during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The discussion concentrates on the employment of combat logistics forces; the movement of high priority cargo, mail, and passengers; ordnance; ship and aircraft readiness; salvage support; and construction battalions.
Read More
November 1, 1990
This research memorandum presents a means of calculating the expected length of 'awaiting-parts time' of weapon replaceable assemblies, which are needed to calculate aircraft readiness in a multi-indenture, readiness-based sparing model. The method presented is appropriate for any other level of indenture. Although full scale application of the model is not feasible at this time, the model aids in comparing and evaluating existing models.
Read More | Download Report
February 1, 1987
Estimates of the costs of the tanker portion of the Ready Reserve Force (RRF) from 1987 to 1995 are provided. These estimates show what it would cost if the Navy chose to fill the entire shortfall of U.S.-owned militarily useful tankers by building up the RRF. The study does not recommend this course of action, but merely establishes what the Navy's dollar costs are likely to be in the years ahead. An important finding is that the annual costs of an RRF of that size would substantially exceed budgeted funds as reflected in the latest Five Year Defense Plan. Without additional funding of about $200 million or more per year over the next nine years, the tanker RRF probably would not be able to accomplish the Navy's fuel-delivery mission. Even with such an infusion of funds the RRF may not be workable, because adequate supplies of U.S. merchant sailors and U.S. shipyards may not be available.
Read More | Download Report
September 1, 1986
Tanker tonnage and the numbers of tankers available to support U.S. forces in wartime are projected for 1990, 1995, 2000, and 2010. The key finding of the analysis is that the supply of tankers will fall far short of estimated Department of Defense (DOD) requirements. This rapid shrinkage of tankers is deemed likely because domestic crude oil production is projected to decline substantially, and because additional pipeline construction is underway. If DOD continues to rely on the Ready Reserve Force to fill the shortfall in numbers of available tankers, by the mid-1990s the fleet of reserve tankers would have to be expanded to about triple the size DOD currently anticipates. Accordingly, the study recommends that the Navy consider the alternative policy of outsourcing for delivering fuel to armed forces during wartime. rtime.
Read More | Download Report
May 1, 1984
Base Operating Support (BOS) costs of the Army, Navy, and Air Force were included in this analysis. Statistical regression techniques were used and models were provided identified variables that can be used to predict BOS costs, compare BOS spending across services, and measure regional variations in BOS spending.
Read More | Download Report
November 1, 1981
This study evaluates petroleum issues facing the Navy over the next 20 years. It analyzes the threat of reduced availability of petroleum and the probable effects on Naval warfare, on the selection of weapons, and on mobility. There are four areas of investigation: the current oil market, production forecasts, the prospect of import interruptions, and Navy options. The study addresses the changes in the oil market since the embargo of 1973. It explains how those changes in the market have affected Navy budgets and eroded steaming and flying hours. Published forecasts of lowered production of petroleum and the threat of interruptions of imports are evaluated for their potential to disrupt world markets out to the year 2000. Several aspects of future petroleum supplies are quantified. The study concludes by recommending measures the Navy can take to deal with the problems of reduced fuel availability and quality.
Read More | Download Report