Research for Acquisition

Syndicate content
March 1, 2006
This study is the fourth in a series of reports that collectively support a revitalized process to assess and track the portfolio of programs overseen by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, Development and Acquisition) (ASN(RDA)). The previous studies were: 1. Improving Metrics for Acquisition Management, Gary E. Christle, November 2001. (CNA Annotated Briefing D0004960.A2/Final). 2. Improving Acquisition Metrics, by Gary E. Christle, Dr. W. Brent Boning and Viki Johnson, October 2002 (CNA Annotated Briefing D0006466.A2/Final). 3. Implementing Acquisition Metrics: Portraying Program Risk for Acquisition Executives, Gary E. Christle, June 2004 (CNA Annotated Briefing D0010289.A2/Final). This report describes an improved process for assessing and overseeing the Navy portfolio of acquisition programs. The study proposes a Strategic Management System for the ASN (RDA). Proposal follows an industry model using an annual operating plan to support a balanced scorecard approach to accountability.
Read More
July 1, 2003
We review several innovative commercial and Navy acquisition practices introduced mainly during the 1990s. The first group of practices is associated with greater supplier involvement over the product lifecycle (such as maintenance of retail stock, third-party logistics, bundling of maintenance with equipment, leasing, and purchasing equipment services rather than the equipment). A second group of practices entails changes in the nature of the buyer-supplier relationship (such as partnering and long-term contracting, allocating intellectual property rights, and greater reliance on incentives). For each acquisition practice, we document examples of its application in both commercial and Navy contexts. We conclude that the first group of practices would be more likely to benefit the Navy if the Navy’s purchases constitute a small share of the total market for the good or service. The benefits from the second group of practices, on the other hand, can be derived even when the Navy is a large buyer relative to the total market. These latter practices could be applied more widely.
Read More | Download Report
July 1, 1993

How can the Navy best "institutionalize" strategic change? In the 1970’s the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Admiral Elmo R. Zumwalt, Jr., tried to do it He attempted to shift the Navy's focus away from attacking the USSR from the sea, to sweeping their ships, especially submarines, from the seas. This research memorandum (CRM) examines that example.

Read More | Download Report